<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emanuel&#8217;s new study on hurricanes.?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chas.</title>
		<link>http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5685</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm#comment-5685</guid>
		<description>I just wonder if the huricanes read the article. If they did, they still won't know what to do since the article, and all other articles, just report that nobody knows. Though, to the author's  credit, they do manage to take several hundred words to point this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder if the huricanes read the article. If they did, they still won&#8217;t know what to do since the article, and all other articles, just report that nobody knows. Though, to the author&#8217;s  credit, they do manage to take several hundred words to point this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speakeasy</title>
		<link>http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5686</link>
		<dc:creator>speakeasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm#comment-5686</guid>
		<description>Well, any ignorant lout who watched &#34;The Day After Tomorrow&#34; is going to be pretty sure global warming will bring catastrophic hurricanes and all the science you quote them won't overcome their indoctrination.

In most of the population, fear is so much stronger than fact and reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, any ignorant lout who watched &quot;The Day After Tomorrow&quot; is going to be pretty sure global warming will bring catastrophic hurricanes and all the science you quote them won&#8217;t overcome their indoctrination.</p>
<p>In most of the population, fear is so much stronger than fact and reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy W</title>
		<link>http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5687</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm#comment-5687</guid>
		<description>Let me see... Misinformation, on top of misinformation, backed by more misinformation, qualified by more misinformation.  Remember that ozone hole thing?  Yea, that's how global warming got started in the first place.  Some people that happen to be in positions that allow them an audience, hears of an obscure theory and thinks... Hmmm, I could get very wealthy off of this...  Then touts a bunch of bull for everyone to feed off of.  

Can't paint a pile of dung pink and call it pretty.  It just is a pile of dung, as in the global warming hoax.

They (IPCC) have known that hurricanes and tornadoes are clearly random and cannot, in any way be attributed to global warming.  It is the nutbags that keep associating psunami's, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes and tornados to global warming.  Their theory is so outstretched, which it is intended to be, so that people are so shocked that they cannot see through the confusion or are willing to challenge the science...  Thereby you get &#34;the debate is over&#34; statements. Still global warming is one of the greatest laughable theories to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me see&#8230; Misinformation, on top of misinformation, backed by more misinformation, qualified by more misinformation.  Remember that ozone hole thing?  Yea, that&#8217;s how global warming got started in the first place.  Some people that happen to be in positions that allow them an audience, hears of an obscure theory and thinks&#8230; Hmmm, I could get very wealthy off of this&#8230;  Then touts a bunch of bull for everyone to feed off of.  </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t paint a pile of dung pink and call it pretty.  It just is a pile of dung, as in the global warming hoax.</p>
<p>They (IPCC) have known that hurricanes and tornadoes are clearly random and cannot, in any way be attributed to global warming.  It is the nutbags that keep associating psunami&#8217;s, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes and tornados to global warming.  Their theory is so outstretched, which it is intended to be, so that people are so shocked that they cannot see through the confusion or are willing to challenge the science&#8230;  Thereby you get &quot;the debate is over&quot; statements. Still global warming is one of the greatest laughable theories to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5688</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm#comment-5688</guid>
		<description>Sure.  Fine work.  

There's a legitimate scientific controversy about the effects of global warming on hurricanes.

But note that most all scientists on either side of this issue (including Emanuel), still say global warming is real, and mostly caused by us.  The data on that is very clear, unlike the data on hurricanes, which is mixed.

Good book about the hurricane issue:

http://www.amazon.com/Storm-World-Hurricanes-Politics-Warming/dp/B00155GE8G/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1208325630&amp;sr=8-4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure.  Fine work.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a legitimate scientific controversy about the effects of global warming on hurricanes.</p>
<p>But note that most all scientists on either side of this issue (including Emanuel), still say global warming is real, and mostly caused by us.  The data on that is very clear, unlike the data on hurricanes, which is mixed.</p>
<p>Good book about the hurricane issue:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Storm-World-Hurricanes-Politics-Warming/dp/B00155GE8G/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1208325630&amp;sr=8-4" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Storm-World-Hurricanes-Politics-Warming/dp/B00155GE8G/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1208325630&amp;sr=8-4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ned s</title>
		<link>http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5689</link>
		<dc:creator>ned s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hurricanequestions.com/emanuels-new-study-on-hurricanes.htm#comment-5689</guid>
		<description>It will be disreguarded along with any other studies that people with no agendas produce stating that it is a big fat hoax. Does it really matter to the true enviromentalist who want a return to horse and buggy days or socialized big govt?
NO!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be disreguarded along with any other studies that people with no agendas produce stating that it is a big fat hoax. Does it really matter to the true enviromentalist who want a return to horse and buggy days or socialized big govt?<br />
NO!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

