Hurricane Issues
Recent Hurricane Questions
- Day After Vermont’s Flooding from Hurricane Irene
- 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- Hurricane Katrina - YOU MUST WATCH THIS
- Tornado in Olathe, Kansas! May 6, 2012
- Tornado F5 Video! Very Close & Roaring Pass! April 27th 2011 Super Outbreak Phil Campbell, AL
- Supercell INSANITY! Massive hail, rope tornado, incredible supercell structure
- PROFESSIONAL PAINTBALL - Birth of a Storm: The New England Hurricanes Documentary EPISODE I
- Raw Video: Texas Tornado’s Destructive Path
- Faidley’s Storm Footage Weather Clips Storms Stock Video
- F5 Tornado in Joplin, MO May 22, 2011 Live
- Northwest Oklahoma tornadoes 4-14-12 extended version
- ! - April 22 2012 Storm Footage 001
- 8/28/2011 Hurricane Irene Slams Into Groton, CT Long Point Shoreline.
- Hurricane Irene Footage -Flooded Park in Union NJ After Irene Hit
- 8/28/2011 Hurricane Irene Storm Surge Camera, Groton, CT
Tags
Opinions
- IrenaPrude on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- irelandcool1 on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- TheMattDOOM on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- TheMegaPeoplepersons on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- katiethepig on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- NiamhHunt on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- GNews10 on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- SpartanGuy on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- stlplaya78 on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- RobsterJay on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- viperq on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- WhelenVTXR2 on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- randomtvusa on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- OpenSourceBrain on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
- niselat on 2012 TVN aerial attack testing for tornado science! Air cannons, probe tracking, and more!
Categories
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
Links
- Cyclone Picture
- Cyclone Weather
- Disaster Relief
- Florida Hurricane Center
- Hurricane Blog
- Hurricane Center
- Hurricane Data
- Hurricane Insurance
- Hurricane Safety
- Hurricane Season
- Hurricane Shutters
- Hurricane Tracking
- Hurricane.com - Windows
- Supply Kit
- Tornado Photo
- Tropical Storm Footage
- Tropical Storm Watch
- Weather Forcast
- Weather Shelter
No, it depends on wind speed, not damage or size, but wind speed. so it could very well be an f5
Lets say a tornado had 300 km/h of wind speed; it may have not hit a city, so why should it be a F-5? If you still dont believe me do some research on them.
Ok, after doing some more research, According to several sites, the F scale is based on wind speed AS WELL AS damage done. So it is not only the damage, but also the wind speed, so yes, I was wrong as I had my facts a little off. My apologies.
F5 my ass.
Yes but, apologizing is not needed, as i was wrong too.
you cant call a tornado an F-5 due to size you gotta go by what destruction it has done.
and the douche of the week trophy goes to ……..
Idiot i posted that a month ago
ya and your comment still sounds as douchey as it did 4 weeks ago…..amazing!!! it still has some punch and thats why you won douche of week
and at least i started a actual debate about factors of the tornado. And you are just randomly deciding what you think should be what when noone even gives a crap about it.
that thing is huge and freaky.
DAYUMMMMM
its moving so fuckin fast ….
that is an american size tornado lol…..
its by width and destruction
ah okay thank you, i was always told by distruction. thanks for clearifying mate
how did it go so fast?
Tornado classification has nothing to do with width. It’s damage. They use the damage to deduce approximate wind speeds. If a tornado does no damage it’s automatically rated ef 0 no matter the wind speed.
Wrong buddy. The wind speed has a direct correlation to damage. That’s why the wind speeds are approximates. Wikipedia the enhanced fujita scale my friend. If it does no damage it’s an ef 0 no matter the wind speed.
Yeah, um, that comment was posted a LONG time ago. I have learned since then. Good timing on that reply there my friend.
That’s not true; it IS by destruction. Check out the Elie, Manitoba tornado - it was rather small but was an F5 anyways. Compare it to wedge tornadoes and see the size difference.
An F0 can be larger than an F5 in width or length or volume or whatever other physical characteristics. Unlikely but possible.
Size has nothing to do with tornadoes. It’s solely based on winds peed, which is normally measured through the destruction caused.
I think the footage was sped up
It’s by destruction, width has nothing to do width it.
EXACTLY
someone told me that it wasnt but i knew they were wrong 